top of page

Structural Family Therapy

Structural Family Therapy is a sub-type in the Systemic and Family Therapies category. It focuses on understanding and modifying the underlying family organization—its boundaries, hierarchies, and subsystems. Structural Family Therapy centers on the idea that dysfunctional family interactions stem from rigid, enmeshed, or disengaged relational patterns. It assumes that by actively restructuring these patterns—often through strategic, in-session interventions—families can achieve healthier functioning, clearer boundaries, and better communication.

 

It’s based on Salvador Minuchin’s model, emphasizing that a therapist can ‘join’ the family system and provoke real-time change. Emphasis is placed on identifying and shifting how family members align, who holds authority, and the degree of closeness or distance between subsystems.

 

Structural Family Therapy Techniques

  • Joining and Accommodation: The therapist ‘joins’ the family by adapting communication style and empathizing with each member’s perspective

  • Family Mapping: Charts out relationships, boundaries, and alliances to visualize the family’s current structure

  • Enactments: Encourages family members to act out routine interactions or conflicts in session, revealing problematic patterns

  • Boundary Making: Introduces interventions that clarify roles and relational distance, reducing enmeshment or disengagement

  • Reframing and Restructuring: Adjusts how family members perceive their roles, redistributing power or responsibility to foster healthier dynamics

 

Structural Family Therapy Reviewed from the Point of View of Other Systemic and Family Therapy Sub-Types

  • Family Constellations
    Critiques Structural Family Therapy for focusing heavily on immediate relational organization rather than intergenerational traumas or hidden loyalties that may also influence family dynamics.

​

Structural Family Therapy Reviewed from Other Sub-Types Across All Categories

  • CBT-Based Therapies (e.g., REBT, Schema Therapy)
    Suggest that Structural Family Therapy, while strong on relational interventions, might underutilize cognitive or behavioral strategies for modifying individual family members’ thought patterns and coping skills.

  • Psychodynamic (e.g., Jungian Psychoanalysis, Hypnotherapy)
    Argue that focusing primarily on overt family structure may overlook deeper unconscious processes or symbolic elements shaping family conflicts.

  • Humanistic and Existential (e.g., Gestalt Therapy, Logo Therapy)
    Contend that Structural Family Therapy’s goal-directed and strategic methods might overshadow personal exploration of meaning, emotional awareness, and existential concerns within the family.

  • Somatic (e.g., Somatic Experiencing)
    Criticize Structural Family Therapy for not explicitly addressing the physiological underpinnings of stress or trauma responses within family interactions.

  • Direct Neural Rewiring (e.g., Brainspotting)
    Maintains that Structural Family Therapy’s main focus is on interpersonal patterns, thus missing targeted interventions for subcortical trauma or deep emotional triggers.

  • Energy Rebalancing (e.g., Reiki)
    Suggests Structural Family Therapy highlights the ‘visible’ structure of relationships but disregards any potential energetic dynamics within the family system.

  • Ego Awakening (e.g., Diamond Approach)
    Points out that while Structural Family Therapy rearranges roles and boundaries, it may reinforce familial identities and ego structures rather than questioning the fundamental self-concept or deeper layers of being.

  • Breath-Oriented (e.g., Holotropic Breathwork)
    Notes that Structural Family Therapy typically remains in a conscious, talk-based realm, not utilizing altered states of consciousness that might illuminate or accelerate systemic change.

  • Body-Stimulation (e.g., TRE)
    Argues that while family interactions are restructured, the therapy might not explicitly help individuals discharge physical tension or trauma responses stored in the body.

  • Psychedelic-Oriented Protocols (e.g., Psilocybin)
    Believes Structural Family Therapy’s step-by-step restructuring approach could be supplemented by the rapid family dynamic insights or shifts sometimes reported in carefully facilitated psychedelic sessions.

 

 

Structural Family Therapy Reviewed from the Perspective of the Six Major Therapies

  • Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT)
    Critiques Structural Family Therapy for not disputing irrational beliefs within the family system, focusing more on reorganizing relationship patterns than challenging dysfunctional cognitions.

  • Jungian Psychoanalysis
    Suggests that while Structural Family Therapy tackles overt relational structures, it may overlook archetypal or symbolic layers influencing each family member’s behavior and emotional life.

  • Positive Psychology
    Criticizes Structural Family Therapy for primarily targeting dysfunctional interactions, advocating greater attention to nurturing collective strengths, gratitude, and positive family rituals.

  • Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT)
    Argues that Structural Family Therapy’s strategic interventions might benefit from mindfulness practices to help family members observe their interactions with present-moment awareness and less reactivity.

  • Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR)
    Maintains that Structural Family Therapy does not incorporate bilateral stimulation or trauma reprocessing protocols, possibly leaving unresolved traumatic experiences unaddressed within the family.

  • Rogerian Counseling (Person-Centered Therapy)
    Criticizes Structural Family Therapy for being highly directive at times, favoring a more empathic, client-led approach that prioritizes acceptance and unconditional positive regard over structural realignment.


     

bottom of page